Identify how juries are selected for criminal trials.
What will be an ideal response?
Examples should discuss how a venire is created randomly from sources such as motor vehicle records and voter registration. Attorneys can challenge the array if there is a deficiency or illegality in the method in which the pool was selected. The next step is voir dire where prospective jurors are questioned by the judge, the prosecutor, and the defense. Jurors may be struck for cause when the defense counsel, the prosecutor, or the judge believes that a juror is unable to be unbiased, fair, or impartial. The attorneys also have a limited number of peremptory challenges where they do not have to give the legal basis for removing the juror.
You might also like to view...
A young male teen with an absent father may be likely to emphasize Miller's focal concern of __________
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The Doctrinethat is a legal principle that excludes from introduction at trial any evidence later developed as a result of an illegal search or seizure is known as the fruit of the _______________ Tree Doctrine
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
If the witness objects to taking an oath, the trial judge may:
A) disqualify the witness. B) order the witness to take an oath. C) allow the witness to make an affirmation. D) gag the witness.
Narrative analysis (NA) and conversation analysis (CA) are both types of qualitative analysis. Compare and contrast these two techniques. Give an example of a situation in which you would want to use narrative analysis and an example of a situation in which conversation analysis would be better suited.
What will be an ideal response?