Why should companies publish a policy stating their right to inspect computing assets at will?
What will be an ideal response?
ANSWER: If a company doesn’t display a warning banner or publish a policy stating that it reserves the right to inspect computing assets at will, employees have an expectation of privacy. When an employee is being investigated, this expected privacy prevents the employer from legally conducting an intrusive investigation. A well-defined company policy, therefore, should state that an employer has the right to examine, inspect, or access any company-owned computing assets. If a company issues a policy statement to all employees, the employer can investigate digital assets at will without any privacy right restrictions; this practice might violate the privacy laws of countries in the EU, for example. As a standard practice, companies should use both warning banners and policy statements. For example, if an incident is escalated to a criminal complaint, prosecutors prefer showing juries warning banners instead of policy manuals. A warning banner leaves a much stronger impression on a jury.
You might also like to view...
A queue is a container that allows elements to be stored and removed
A) in a last-in-first-out fashion B) in a first-in-first-out fashion C) in a first-in-last-out fashion D) quickly and efficiently
A program installed by hackers that allows them to take almost complete control of your computer without your knowledge is called a(n) ________ program
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Which is an example of a discretionary project?
A. Creating a new report for a user B. Adding a report required by a new federal law C. Including annual updates to payroll and tax percentages D. Updating quarterly changes in reporting requirements for an insurance processing system
Describe the mv command.
What will be an ideal response?