Which best describes the difference between total preemption and partial preemption?
a. In partial preemption, state regulatory standards need to be as least as stringent as those of the federal government.
b. In partial preemption, states can determine which regulatory standards need to match that of the federal government.
c. In partial preemption, state law in a particular field is valid as long as it does not conflict with federal law.
d. In partial preemption, state law in a particular field is valid even if the federal government has all regulatory powers in the field.
Ans: c. In partial preemption, state law in a particular field is valid as long as it does not conflict with federal law.
You might also like to view...
How do social cleavages in French society help generate much of the country's unrest?
What will be an ideal response?
Which chief justice wrote the opinion in Barron v. Baltimore limiting the protections of the Bill of Rights to action by the federal government?
a. Roberts b. Marshall c. Burger d. Warren
Which Supreme Court case applied the "one-person, one-vote" principle to county precincts?
A) Baker v. Carr (1962)
B) Wesberry v. Sanders (1964)
C) Reynolds v. Simms (1964)
D) Avery v. Midland County (1968)
In general, members of the ______ Party are more skeptical of global warming caused by human actions.
a. Green b. Democratic c. Independent d. Republican