Find the cost effective allocation of abatement across the two sources that also satisfies the 40 percent aggregate abatement level. Support with calculations.
Suppose that there are only two stationary sources in a given air quality region. The first source has been in existence for several years, while the second source is new. The following functions represent marginal abatement costs (MAC) for each polluting source:
MACEX = 10.0 + 0.7A EX, MACN = 9.2 + 0.5A N,
whereAEX is the percentage abatement level for the existing source, and AN is the percentage abatement level for the new source.
Assume that the aggregate abatement standard (i.e., for the region as a whole) is set at 40 percent and that the two firms’ current abatement levels areAEX = 10 and AN = 30.
To find the cost effective allocation of individual abatement levels, set MACEX = MACNwhile maintaining the 40 percent aggregate abatement level. This is determined by simultaneously solving the following two equations:
MACEX = MACN
AEX + AN = 40
Therefore:
10.0 + 0.7(AEX) = 9.2 + 0.5(AN), where A N = 40 ?AEX
Substituting and solving:
10.0 + 0.7(AEX) = 9.2 + 0.5(40 ?AEX)
10.0 + 0.7(AEX) = 29.2 ? 0.5(AEX)
1.2(AEX) = 19.2
AEX = 16
AN = 40 ?AEX = 40 – 16 = 24.
Notice that when AEX = 16, MACEX = 10.0 +.7(16) = 21.2, and when AN= 24, MACN = 9.2 +.5(24) = 21.2. Since MACEX = MACN= 21.2, the abatement allocation of AEX = 16 and AN= 24 is cost-effective.
You might also like to view...
Along a supply curve,
A. supply changes as price changes. B. quantity supplied changes as price changes. C. supply changes as technology changes. D. quantity supplied changes as technology changes.
The "Prisoners' Dilemma" is an example of a cooperative game
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Refer to the above diagram. The firm will shut down at any price less than:
A. P1.
B. P2.
C. P3.
D. P4.
Explain how a specific tax equal to the marginal harm of pollution can increase or decrease total welfare in a monopoly market
What will be an ideal response?