In In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing, the listing of the polar bear as a threatened specie was challenged. It is not endangered today but could be in the future. The listing by the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) was attacked as arbitrary and capricious. The appeals court held that:
a. courts may not review decisions of the FWS regarding such listings
b. the listing was proper as FWS explalined its rationale sufficiently
c. the listing was improper because the FWS failed to show that its survival was in danger unless very strange assumptions were made
d. the listing was arbitrary and capricious as the FWS failed to justify its decision based on scientific evidence
e. none of the other choices
b
You might also like to view...
A vice president of a shoe company was in India to assess the market. He found that many people in the southern part of India were walking bare footed. This can be indicative of either the fact that there is a potential market for shoes or there is no market for shoes in that part of the world. To formally confirm one instinct or the other the vice president should:
A) establish an office to start manufacturing shoes in India. B) give free shoe samples to a selected group of customers. C) conduct research to find potential and actual customers. D) find out if that is true for other Asian countries. E) give up the idea of doing business in India.
Discuss the similarities and differences among ANOVA, regression, and discriminant analysis (Table 18.1 in the text)
What will be an ideal response?
What is the effect of the collection of accounts receivable on the current ratio and net working capital, respectively? Current Ratio Net Working Capital
a. No effect No effect b. Increase Increase c. Increase No effect d. No effect Increase
The manager of a profit center does not make decisions concerning the fixed assets invested in the center
Indicate whether the statement is true or false