What is the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court case of Randolph v. Georgia (2006) on consent searches?
What will be an ideal response?
The United States Supreme Court decided that consent given by one occupant is not valid in the face of the refusal of another physically present occupant. In other words, if two people are present and have equal authority to grant and/or deny consent to search, when one party objects and the other consents, the objection overrules the consent, thereby not allowing police to search.
You might also like to view...
Which agency of criminal justice is responsible for carrying out the punishment imposed on the offender?
a. police b. courts c. corrections d. prisons
Which of the following are the two requirements the decision in Katz v. U.S. specified in order for a reasonable expectation of privacy to exist?
a. The person must have put a fence around their property and put up no trespassing signs b. The person must have exhibited an actual expectation of privacy and the expectation must be one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable c. The person must have a subjective expectation of privacy and police must have a warrant d. The person must be in their home (or their curtilage) and police cannot use technology that is not available to the general public
One of the conditions that must occur for a cigarette to start a wildfire is that the RH is more than 22 percent.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Community policing
a. is the result of government intervention techniques. b. is focused on its evolving strategy of community efforts. c. is an organization-wide philosophy. d. works to direct citizens toward management goals.