Would a letter written after the execution of a contract and which contained agreements different from those in the written contract be admissible under the parol evidence rule?
a. No, because it contradicts the terms of the contract.
b. No, because it changes the agreement.
c. No, because it explains the agreement.
d. Yes, it would be admissible, because it is subsequent to the written agreement.
d
You might also like to view...
After 1 month on the job, Tanner was fired for not learning the job fast enough. His employer can do this easily under a(n) ______.
A. code of conduct B. employment monitoring C. contract D. orientation period
_____ arise from relatively infrequent transactions, and there can be no assurance that they will recur in any future period
a. Gains/Losses b. Revenues c. Expenses d. Assets e. Liabilities
Which of the following facts is NOT a reason that listening can be challenging?
a. The human ear is unable to keep up with the speech rate of most speakers. b. Our minds process much faster than a speaker can talk. c. The listener often thinks ahead to anticipate future points and evaluate the ideas heard. d. Listeners often make written notes as they listen.
In the context of training methods, ________ refers to assigning employees to different roles in the organization to broaden their experience and improve their skills.
A. needs assessment B. job rotation C. role-playing D. lecturing E. adverse impact