What is the difference between hard power and soft power in U.S. foreign policy? How did hard power figure prominently during the Cold War? How has the uncertainty of the modern world made the use of hard power less effective?
Describe how a foreign policy approach can combine both hard and soft power to be most effective.
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Explain that hard power involves using military strength to force another nation to act a certain way under the threat of attack, while soft power involves using negotiation and diplomacy to solve international problems.
2. Identify that hard power was the basis of the theory of deterrence, under which the United States maintained enough nuclear weapons to deter the Soviet Union from attacking it.
3. Discuss how hard power and military might are no longer enough to ensure success in dealing with international problems such as free trade, global climate change, and terrorism, the solutions to which demand understanding and cooperation between countries.
4. Outline how the most effective approach involves a combination of conventional diplomacy to send clear messages to nations, foreign aid to help nations in need, economic sanctions to isolate adversaries, public diplomacy to help other nations understand the U.S. agenda, coalition building to gain support from other countries, and military action when necessary
You might also like to view...
What are the principle disadvantages of using secondary data? How can a researcher minimize these disadvantages?
What will be an ideal response?
For an accused person, the first formal stage of the criminal justice system is the arrest
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
State enactment of legislation parallel to federal merit system legislation
a. established comprehensive merit systems in all fifty states by 1980. b. established comprehensive merit systems in forty-nine states by 1949. c. set the pace for perfection of the federal civil service system. d. was encouraged by conditions set by 1939 amendments to federal Social Security legislation of 1935.
An example of the limitations of the plain-meaning-of-the-text theory is
A) that no two judges interpretations of the history and the Constitution are alike. B) that ascertaining the goals of the writers and those who ratified the Constitution is based on speculation. C) that it reduces constitutional interpretation to the judge's personal understanding of the meaning of American history. D) the ambiguous language in the Constitution that its drafters added in order to win ratification. E) that it requires extensive inquiry into debates undertaken in the distant past.