In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that would not follow its pricing policy (resale price maintenance). The Supreme Court held that:
a. all vertical price fixing subject to a per se rule of illegality
b. vertical price restraints would be viewed under a rule of reason
c. vertical price restraints injure the ability of sellers to compete so are generally illegal d. vertical price fixing of minimum prices is subject to a per se rule of illegality
e. none of the other choices
b
You might also like to view...
Yield analysis forces managers to recognize the opportunity cost of selling capacity for a given date to a customer from one market segment when another might subsequently yield a higher rate
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What factors lead to miscommunication in a team?
What will be an ideal response?
What is the broad objective of the design of compensation programs?
What will be an ideal response?
Delivery of a bearer instrument is sufficient to pass title
Indicate whether the statement is true or false