At what point should an arrested individual be advised of his or her constitutional rights?
What will be an ideal response?
Arrested individuals should be advised of their constitutional rights when they are in a custodial setting, that is, not free to leave, and when they are being interrogated about a specific crime where their answers may incriminate them. Note that just because individuals are arrested, they need not always be Mirandized. They only need to be Mirandized if the police want to question them while they are in a custodial setting and when their answers could be incriminating. In other words, a person arrested for committing a crime in an officer's presence, such as driving while intoxicated, would not have to be necessarily Mirandized.
You might also like to view...
In which of the progressive career stages of stress involves emotional unsureness?
A) 15-20 years B) 5-10 years C) 10-15 years D) 0-5 years
The Manson family is an example of which type of cult?
a. New world order b. Passive apocalyptic c. Social-isolationist d. Violent apocalyptic
Caution had been advised on using behavioral indicators to detect deceit when the interviewee is not of the same culture or gender as the interviewer. Describe two additional concerns that center on the misinterpretation of behaviors
What will be an ideal response?
Explain the similarities and differences between deviance and crime, and provide examples.
What will be an ideal response?