Select the true statement.
a. The same level of suspicion is required to justify a frisk and a full search
b. A police officer needs more than a hunch to justify both a frisk and a full search, but less is required for a frisk than is required for a full search.
c. Probable cause is required to initially justify a frisk.
d. To stop a person, probable cause is needed; but to frisk a person reasonable suspicion is required.
b
You might also like to view...
Rodney is creating a disturbance in the lobby of the movie theater. He is claiming that he gave the snack bar attendant a $20 bill but the attendant only gave him change for $10
The theater manager tells Rodney to settle down or he will have to leave the theater. Rodney continues to complain loudly. The manager summons the security officer who also tells Rodney to either settle down or leave. Instead Rodney sits down in front of the snack bar. "That's it," says the theater manager. "Throw him out." Rodney refuses to budge. At this point the security officer may lawfully: A) use force to eject Rodney only after Rodney fails to comply with a direct order from the manager to depart. B) take no action because security officers have no authority in these situations. C) use force to eject Rodney from the premises. D) only call the police for assistance because only the police are authorized to eject trespassers.
________ is NOT a principle feature of indeterminate sentencing systems.
A. Sentences based on information obtained in a sentencing hearing after conviction B. The grant of great discretion to the trial judge to fashion a sentence C. The U.S. and the state senate's interventions D. A parole board
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1.California was the first state to implement a Victims’ Bill of Rights. 2.The costs of crime are limited to tangible costs, such as medical bills, loss of property, etc. 3.Menachem Amir empirically studied victim precipitation in rape and sexual assaults.
Allows the court to render a "middle-ground" verdict in the case of allegedly mentally disordered defendants. The goal is to hold the defendant blameworthy but recognize the presence of a mental disorder.