Webstar Corp orally agreed to sell Northco, Inc, a computer for $20,000 . Northco sent a signed purchase order to Webstar confirming the agreement. Webstar received the purchase order and did not respond. Webstar refused to deliver the computer to Northco, claiming that the purchase order did not satisfy the UCC statute of frauds because it was not signed by Webstar. Northco sells computers to
the general public, and Webstar is a computer wholesaler. Under the UCC Sales Article, Webstar's position is:
a. Incorrect, because it failed to object to Northco's purchase order.
b. Incorrect, because only the buyer in a sale-of-goods transaction must sign the contract.
c. Correct, because it was the party against whom enforcement of the contract is being sought.
d. Correct, because the purchase price of the computer exceeded $500.
.A
You might also like to view...
The essence of marketing is to surpass the competition at the task of creating perceived value
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Using different depreciation methods for book purposes versus tax purposes for the same asset is
a. not allowed since the amount can only be calculated one way or the other, not both. b. the direct result of the differing goals of financial and tax accounting. c. contrary to GAAP. d. against the Internal Revenue Code, and as such, against the law.
Explain the shell company fraud
The liability of the accountant can be both civil and criminal.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)