Which one of the following is true of the influence of place of residence on political opinion?
Since the 1950s, the Republican Party has become the majority or competitive in all southern states.
You might also like to view...
Why do state legislators rely more on their state and local parties for election assistance than do their congressional counterparts?
a. because state legislators are not able to make campaign-related decisions on their own b. because state legislators base their main talking points directly on state and local public policy c. because members of Congress do not like to make visits to their home states d. because members of Congress have easier access to funds and other campaign resources from other sources
This question aligns with Chapters 2 and 3 of Writing a Research Paper in Political Science.Review the CQ Researcher article"Reviving Rural Economies." Which of the following is a school of thought that you could develop to answer the research question: "Recently, why have rural areas been able to wield more clout in American politics than their population size would suggest?"
A. Power to the (Older) People: Younger people have been fleeing rural areas leaving behind older people. Older citizens are more likely to vote, so politicians have a greater incentive to pay attention to them. B. Electoral College: The Electoral College overrepresents rural communities, and thus gives rural areas more power in American politics. (Note that the loser of the popular vote has won the election in two of the last five elections.) C. Greater Incumbency Advantages: Reelection rates for representatives and senators in rural areas have been higher, allowing those officials to wield more seniority and therefore power in Congress. D. Rural Cooperation: Federal rural lawmakers are better than their urban colleagues at cooperating to achieve mutually beneficial legislation, while those from cities often view each other as competitors for scarce dollars. E. all of these
Can regulations be arbitrarily imposed?
What will be an ideal response?
What is the central difference between the free market policies that exacerbate inequality and the capabilities of the pan-ethnic movements that George Lipsitz believes could have a greater effect on positive societal change?
A. Pan-ethnic movements are able to garner greater support through inclusion, which will in turn affect elections and policy changes, while free market policies remain possessively invested in whiteness. B. Pan-ethnic movements use society’s investment in whiteness to promote white leaders who support positive change, while free market policy supporters actively suppress these leaders. C. Pan-ethnic movements can acknowledge and combat the power of whiteness that intensifies inequality, while free market policies continue to allow for possessive investment in whiteness by ignoring the unequal power of whiteness. D. Pan-ethnic movements seek to recycle free-market policies into more positive government efforts to decrease inequality, while the original policies themselves remain fundamentally invested in whiteness.