Which of the following best explains why we can rule out the idea that planets are usually formed by near collisions between stars?
A) Stellar near collisions are far too rare to explain all the planets now known to orbit nearby stars.
B) Studies of the trajectories of nearby stars relative to the Sun show that the Sun is not in danger of a near collision with any of them.
C) A near collision might have created planets, but it could not have created moons, asteroids, or comets.
D) A near collision should have left a trail of gas extending out behind the Sun, and we see no evidence of such a trail.
A) Stellar near collisions are far too rare to explain all the planets now known to orbit nearby stars.
You might also like to view...
What is the energy of a photon that, when it is absorbed by a hydrogen atom, excites an electron from the ground state of the hydrogen atom to the n = 2 state?
A) 10.2 eV B) 1.63 × 10-18 J C) 1.63 × 10-18 Nm D) All of the answers are correct. E) None of the answers is correct.
What source of energy might keep water beneath the surface of Enceladus liquid?
A) tidal heating only B) radioactive decay only C) tidal heating and radioactive decay D) heat released from a partially molten core
The rotation curve method can be applied only to pairs of galaxies orbiting each other
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Why does the value of Hubble's constant alone not tell us the fate of the universe?
What will be an ideal response?