Do auditing standards require the use of confirmations in the audits of cash balances and accounts receivable balances?
What will be an ideal response?
For decades, auditors have been required to use external confirmations for accounts receivable unless
accounts receivable are immaterial to the financial statements, the use of confirmations would be
ineffective, or the auditor’s combined assessed level of inherent risk and control risk is low and the
evidence provided by other substantive procedures would reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level.
Those provisions are included in the PCAOB’s AS 2310, “The Confirmation Process,” and they have
been carried forward in the recently finalized ASB Clarity Standard codified in AU-C Section 505,
“External Confirmations.” Interestingly, international auditing standards suggest, but do not require,
their use for accounts receivable.
In contrast to accounts receivable, auditing standards do not require the confirmation of cash
balances. However, confirming cash balances is generally done in most audits.
You might also like to view...
Why do the results of the matching hypothesis disappoint many people who admire people who are quite different than they are?
What will be an ideal response?
Explain the three types of anomalies associated with database tables that have not been normalized
A high-performing team is ______.
a. highly cohesive b. highly adaptable c. highly virtual d. cohesive, but not so cohesive that it fails to adapt to changing circumstances
The VALS™ system is a crucial part of geodemographic segmentation
Indicate whether the statement is true or false