iara owns 100% of the shares of Lion Corporation. Kiara's basis is $70,000 and the FMV of the shares is $200,000. Kiara is willing to sell all of the stock to Tia, but Tia is unwilling to pay more than $150,000 for the stock because the Corporation has excess cash balances. They have agreed that Kiara can withdraw $50,000 in cash from Lion before the stock sale. What tax issues should be
considered with respect to Kiara and Tia's agreement?
What will be an ideal response?
• What is Lion's E&P balance immediately preceding the distribution?
• If $50,000 in cash is withdrawn from the business, will it be treated as a dividend to Kiara?
• Can the $50,000 withdrawn from the business be considered to have been received as part of Kiara's stock sale?
• Can the tax results for the transaction be improved if Kiara has some of her stock redeemed for the $50,000 cash?
• Are the tax consequences of the transaction different if the $50,000 is withdrawn from the business either before or as part of the stock sale?
• Can the $50,000 payment be classified as payment of back wages to Kiara? Would such an amount be deductible by the corporation?
• What is the amount and character of the gain recognized on Kiara's sale of the stock?
The primary issue is whether the $50,000 Kiara receives from Lion's is a dividend or is part of the amount she receives for her stock. If Lion redeems 25% of her stock for $50,000 in cash as part of the same transaction in which her remaining stock is sold to Tia for $150,000, quite likely she can treat the entire $200,000 as being received in exchange for her stock under the bootstrap redemption rules. In such case, she has a $130,000 ($200,000 - $70,000) capital gain.
However, if she receives $50,000 from Lion before entering into the sale agreement with Tia, she will have a $50,000 dividend and then an $80,000 ($150,000 - $70,000) capital gain on a later sale of her stock to Tia.
It is not likely that Lion can treat the $50,000 payment as additional compensation (e.g., a bonus or payment made because of lower-than-normal salary payments made in prior years) and then deduct the payment in computing its corporate tax liability. A possibility might be to treat the $50,000 payment as being paid to Kiara in exchange for a covenant not to compete for a certain period of time. Such payment generally is ordinary income for the recipient but is deductible by the payer over 15 years in accordance with Sec. 197.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is generally true about the marketing of high-touch products such as fine china and crystal?
A) It relies equally on specialized information and image. B) It relies less on image and more on specialized information. C) It relies less on specialized information and more on image. D) Neither image nor specialized information is relevant to the marketing of high-touch products. E) It relies partially on specialized information and partially on image.
Above-average earnings is often the basis for the calculation of goodwill
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
According to Bass and Avolio, what are the characteristics of transformational leadership?
What will be an ideal response?
One of the factors that explained the effectiveness of ambidextrous organizational designs in the O'Reilly and Tushman study was that the reward systems emphasized traditional unit goals.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)