Do you think police officers should be required to read the Miranda warnings? Can you think of any alternatives that would still safeguard against a suspect’s constitutional rights? Is it important to protect those rights? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
This answer is largely left up to the student’s imagination and personal beliefs. Any well-reasoned argument should get credit.
You might also like to view...
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. Policy decisions of the courts do not affect most Americans in their day-to-day lives. 2. Trial courts of general jurisdiction have the legal authority to decide all matters not specifically delegated to lower courts. 3. Felony cases that go to trial will be heard in trial courts of general jurisdiction. 4. Trial courts of limited jurisdiction have the authority to handle arraignments and preliminary hearings for felony cases. 5. All states have both an intermediate court of appeals and a court of last resort.
The effect of increasing severity, certainty and/or swiftness of legal punishment is called _____
a. general deterrence b. marginal deterrence c. positive deterrence d. negative deterrence
Most studies find that the clearance rate has no effect on crime.
a. true b. false
The first S and fundamental of SCRIPT is __________
A) Scene B) Safety C) Support D) Security