INSTRUCTIONS: Select the conclusion that follows in a single step from the given premises. Throughout this test, write your answer on the form provided. Erasure marks may cause the grading machine to mark your answer wrong. Given the following premises: 1 . R • ?S 2 . R ? ?(S • ?F) 3 . ?S ? (F • N)
A) (?S • F) ? N 3, Exp
B) ?S 1, Simp
C) F • N 1, 3, MP
D) R ? (?S ? ??F) 2, DM
E) (?S ? F) • (?S ? N) 3, Dist
D
You might also like to view...
Consider this argument: Some F are G No G are H Which conclusion would make this a deductively valid logical form?
A. No F are H B. Some H are F C. All G are F D. Some F are not H
The logical connectedness of "Merkin, the Subway Slasher responsible for the murders of 17 people last summer, is now in prison. All mass murderers write best-selling books after they're sent to prison
So Merkin will write a best-selling book" is A) strong B) weak C) failed
Evaluation of the events of the Holocaust raises questions about whether God has __________
a. a plan b. a presence c. benevolence d. power
Which of the following is not a standard-form categorical statement?
A. Some dentists are musicians. B. All dogs are not cats. C. No coeds are men. D. Some bears are not carnivores.