How might the question of superseding cause be involved in a case involving someone who injures another after being served liquor at a bar?
What will be an ideal response?
A superseding cause supersedes, or cancels out, the defendant's liability. If the defendant should have foreseen the possibility that an intervening cause or one like it might occur, the defendant remains liable. Here the question is if the serving of liquor was the contributing factor in the assault.
You might also like to view...
What gives teachers the authority to administer corporal punishment to students?
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
?Which of the following sources would be considered a binding authority?
A. ?A constitution B. ?Court decisions from an inferior court in the same jurisdiction C. ?Statutes D. ?Court decisions from a superior court in the same jurisdiction E. ?A constitution, statutes, and court decisions from a superior court in the same jurisdiction
Which governmental entity usually creates the ethical rules of professional responsibility governing the conduct for lawyers in each state?
A) the state legislature B) the trial court in the state capital C) the state's highest appellate court D) the governor's office
What is the difference between a breach of contract claim and a bad faith claim?
What will be an ideal response?