In Washington v. Harper, the U.S. Supreme ruled that:
a. the administration of antipsychotic drugs to unwilling inmates is not unconstitutional.
b. the administration of antipsychotic drugs to unwilling inmates is unconstitutional.
c. the administration of any drugs to inmates in general is unconstitutional.
d. the administration of any psychiatric plan of care to any inmates is unconstitutional.
Answer: a. the administration of antipsychotic drugs to unwilling inmates is not unconstitutional.
You might also like to view...
Explain the parameters of a consent search.
What will be an ideal response?
If a person knowingly manufactures, delivers, or possesses with intent to deliver a controlled substance listed in Penalty Group 2 or 2-A and the controlled substance is, by aggregate weight, including adulterants or dilutants, less than one gram, they have committed a ___________.
a. state jail felony b. felony of the third degree c. felony of the second degree d. felony of the first degree
The definition of larceny evolved with the growth of manufacturing and the development of:
a. a global economy c. nation-states b. the free enterprise system d. international travel
Use the following demand schedule and possible supply schedules, A-D, to answer the question.
A. A
B. B
C. C
D. D