In 1988, prosecutors tried Mel Ignatow for the brutal rape, torture, and murder of his girlfriend. Prosecutors relied mostly on a confession from his accomplice, but the jury didn’t believe her and acquitted Ignatow of murder. Later, the new owners of his home discovered several explicit photos of the crime, proving that he did in fact murder her. Based on this case, which of the following statements would be true?
A. Prosecutors were not able to establish Ignatow’s legal guilt, in spite of the fact that he was factually guilty of the crime.
B. Because the accomplice’s confession that she helped Ignatow murder his girlfriend was circumstantial evidence, the jury decided to acquit.
C. There was no direct evidence of the crime, so the jury acquitted Ignatow.
D. The prosecutor established legal guilt in this case, but not factual guilt.
A. Prosecutors were not able to establish Ignatow’s legal guilt, in spite of the fact that he was factually guilty of the crime.
You might also like to view...
Explain the similarities between Theory X and Y and the concept of hygiene factors/motivators
What will be an ideal response?
Which category of hostage taker often requires the involvement of federal officials and is considered the most difficult for police officers?
A. political terrorists B. individuals who have committed a crime C. individuals with mental disorders D. prisoners
Which Federal Bureau of Prisons division ensures that national policies and procedures are in place that provide a safe, secure institutional environment for inmates and staff?
a. The Program Review Division b. The Information, Policy, and Public Affairs Division c. The Correctional Programs Division d. The Health Services Division
The U.S. Marshals Service is responsible for all of the following EXCEPT:
A. protecting federal judges. B. operating the Witness Security Program. C. regulating firearms and explosives. D. apprehending federal fugitives.