A judge with a conflict of interest in hearing a criminal trial should _______________ him or herself from the case
Fill in the blank with correct word.
Answer: recuse
You might also like to view...
Which term refers to a probation or parole violation of rules that does not involve a new crime?
a. administrative violation b. practical violation c. technical violation d. procedural
There are six constitutional limits on the criminal law. Which limit most often applies to obscenity laws and those dealing with loitering and vagrancy statues? Identify and define the constitutional limit and explain why it best applies
Answer: The void for vagueness doctrine is a constitutional doctrine based on the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution requiring that laws be written with sufficient clarity and specificity. Void for vagueness cases have historically fallen into two categories—those dealing with obscenity laws and those dealing with loitering and vagrancy statues. Several cases, including Winters v. New York and State v. Metzger address void for vagueness specific to obscenity laws. In both cases the courts declared the laws were too vague. Several cases have also dealt with the meaning of loitering and vagrancy statues. Students can cite examples such as Kolender v. Lawson andPapachristou v. City of Jacksonville. a. Result Crimes. b. Conduct Crimes. c. Harmful Crimes. d. Tort.
What are the three primary foci of the DHS's border security mission?
What will be an ideal response?
The defense of consent is
a. a justification defense. b. an excuse defense. c. not a defense. d. a castle doctrine defense.