Kantian ethics has been criticized as being exceptionless. Is this a true criticism? In your answer explain your position
The answer can be either way; yes, it is a true criticism or, no, it is not. Those who believe that it is too exceptionless can argue that this makes the philosophy too rigid for real life. Real life situations are too varied, and, therefore, it is impossible to create rules that can guide us in all situations. Those who argue that the exceptionless quality of Kantian ethics is not a problem do so on the basis that to need exceptions is to regard experience as central to morality, which is metaphysically incorrect. They would argue that consequences are in the realm of experience and are therefore irrelevant to morality. Most practitioners find it uncomfortable to make decisions without consideration of consequences or, similarly, to make decisions based solely on seeking the highest utility.
You might also like to view...
How many massage technique variations are possible?
A) Seven B) Twenty-one C) Endless D) None
When performing routine cleaning procedures, clean the most soiled area first, moving to the least soiled area.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
The person who is legally responsible for all clinical and patient care aspects of an EMS system is the:
A) quality improvement coordinator. B) medical director. C) system administrator. D) battalion chief.
Which event will most likely affect patient satisfaction with the laboratory?
A. Results took a little longer than expected. B. The laboratory waiting area had music playing. C. The phlebotomist forgot to wear her/his name badge. D. The phlebotomist was perceived as being rude.