Compare and contrast state terrorism and state-enabled terrorism
What will be an ideal response
State terrorism is terrorism directed internally, inside of its national borders. This action
contravenes a state's moral and legal duty to protect its citizens. Defined more broadly, state terrorism is directed at a nation's citizens or residents to repress and instill fear in them, to consolidate the ruling regime's power (e.g., by genocide), and to maintain control over the country's civilian population. It is carried out by a state's security, intelligence, and military organizations, and in some cases volunteers. In contrast, state-enabled terrorism is passive. A country allows one or more terrorist movements to exist within its borders as long as no attacks are directed at the citizens or the government.
You might also like to view...
Using the tools you have learned previously, how would you resolve the following scenario in an ethical manner? As newly hired officer, you are partnered with a 10-year veteran who likes to visit his girlfriend for long periods of time while on duty
You partner asks you to stay in the car and only call him for an emergency. What should you do?
At the core of situational crime prevention are all but which one of the following three principles:
a. Natural access control (doors, shrubs, fences) b. Natural surveillance (proper placement of windows, lighting, and landscaping) c. Territorial reinforcement (using fences and such to show ownership) d. Signage, particularly threatening in nature about dogs, Neighborhood Watch, andso on.
Address some of the basic reasons as to why there are several definitions
What will be an ideal response
The State of California, in 1997, mandated ______ to be used as treatment for repeat sexual offenders.
a. life sentences b. chemical castration c. indeterminate sentences d. civil commitment