Was the Court of Appeals correct in setting aside the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff because there must be a complete expectation of privacy to recover intrusion and other employees could hear the conversations in question?
The Court of Appeals was in error requiring a complete expectation of privacy and the Supreme Court of California remanded the case to that court for further proceedings. The Supreme Court held that "an employee may, under some circumstances, have a reasonable expectation of visual or aural privacy against electronic intrusion by a stranger to the workplace despite the fact that the conversations could be witnessed by coworkers or the employer. (Lescht worked at PMG only for a few days and acted solely as an agent of ABC.)
You might also like to view...
For business presentations, time constraints are usually
A) rigid, permitting little or no flexibility. B) meaningless since audiences expect presenters to take extra time. C) imposed only on lower-level employees. D) not important if you are presenting to your colleagues. E) only a suggestion.
All transactions related to specific accounts, such as cash or inventory, are listed and totaled in a:
a. Journal b. Ledger c. Trial balance d. Balance sheet
If the most optimistic time for completing an activity is 1, the most likely time is 2, and the most pessimistic time is 4, then the estimated time for the activity is ______.
A. 2.17 B. 3.63 C. 5.38 D. 9.44
Identify the collective noun in the sentence. The Beaux Arts Trio will perform at the university next Saturday