In Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Markins, the court held that?
A. ?there was no ethics violation because Markins secretly accessed only his wife's emails.
B. ?clients had waived client-attorney confidentiality by including confidential information in emails.
C. ?Markins should be suspended for 2 years because surreptitiously accessing attorney emails violated ethics rules.
D. ?Markins should be prosecuted rather than being disciplined under attorney ethics rules.
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
What is the purpose of rape shield laws?
What will be an ideal response?
Secondary authority cannot be mandatory authority.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
LOELs are punitive damages.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
What is the difference between the warranty extension provided by subsections B and C of UCC section 2-318?
What will be an ideal response?