Due to time constraints, the nurse manager has not adequately monitored for quality improvement following the recent organization-wide change to a new patient-controlled analgesic pump
Which of the following responses by the staff nurses can be expected?
1. "The change to the new PCA pumps is really going well."
2. "I can't get anyone to tell me how to clear the pump without going through five different steps. It seems to take forever."
3. "It sounds like the change is costing the organization a lot less money to rent the pumps."
4. "The nurse manager said that the new pumps are saving the nurses an average of 7 minutes throughout their day."
Answer: 2
Rationale: Change must be evaluated to determine its importance. Evaluating change can help the organization understand whether the change efforts are worthwhile, are cost-effective, and benefit the organization. The staff nurses involved in the change should be knowledgeable about how well the change is going overall. Problems should be pinpointed early, and corrective action should be quickly provided. Staff members should continue to struggle with problems. The staff members should understand how the change is effecting the organization financially. The staff members should be educated about how the change might be saving them time, and to understand the benefits related to the change. These questions can be answered only by evaluating the change. Relevant data should be analyzed carefully and in a timely manner. When evaluation of change is given a low priority, the answers to these questions will be vague and will lack meaning.
You might also like to view...
The nurse knows that because people with mental illness continue to be ostracized by mainstream society, families must cope with the burden of:
1. Dementia. 2. Shame. 3. Isolation. 4. Stigma.
A null hypothesis is stated. The null hypothesis is, "There is no difference between 10 mcg and 20 mcg of vitamin D3 in prevention of osteoporosis." What are the implications of this statement, concerning that hypothesis and type I error?
(Select all that apply.) a. Rejecting the null hypothesis when it actually is false means that the researcher has made a type I error in concluding that there is a difference between 10 mcg and 20 mcg of vitamin D3 in preventing osteoporosis. b. Making the statement is itself a type I error. c. Whether the null hypothesis is true or not makes no difference in terms of type I error. d. Whether or not the researcher rejects the null hypothesis makes no difference in terms of type I error. e. Rejecting the null hypothesis when it actually is false means that the researcher concludes that there is a difference between 10 mcg and 20 mcg of vitamin D3 in preventing osteoporosis, and there is no error. f. Rejecting the null hypothesis when it actually is true means that the researcher concludes that there is no difference between 10 mcg and 20 mcg of vitamin D3 in preventing osteoporosis, but the researcher thinks there is and has made a type I error.
A patient's contract to be taken outside for a fresh air break after meals has been unavoidably postponed
The patient says, "I've waited patiently for 2 hours, and now I want to stay outside for an extra 10 minutes!" An appropriate response from the nurse would be: a. "I'm sorry but you will have to wait. You know that as adults we don't always get what we want when we want it.". b. "I'll arrange to have someone take you after lunch, and you can stay out for as long as you like if you'll just wait patiently.". c. "You are quite right. Thank you for being so patient. Someone will come right now and take you outside for your break.". d. "Please show a little consideration; we've been very busy handling other patients' problems. You would understand if it were you with the problem.".
A client at 40 weeks' gestation is being considered for cervical ripening. Which criteria should the nurse use to determine the client's success for induction? Select all that apply
1. Position 2. Effacement 3. Consistency 4. Fetal heart rate 5. Cervical dilatation