Compare judicial restraint, judicial activism, and strict constructionist philosophies
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: An ideal response will:
1. Note that all three are philosophies used by judges to help them reach a decision in a case.
2. Discuss that judicial restraint focuses on not overruling the decision of other branches, whereas judicial activism asserts that judges should use their power broadly.
3. Explain that a strict constructionist emphasizes the Constitution based on the Framers' original intent.
You might also like to view...
Who argued that people are constrained, both morally and ethically, not to incur any debt that their own generation cannot pay?
a. George Washington b. James Madison c. John Adams d. Thomas Jefferson
Financial innovations like securitization and hedge funds came along with many new government regulations to keep them in check, which is why they were not a cause of the financial crisis
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
Description of political phenomena often lacks __________
a. rationality b. reasoning c. theory d. balance
If you were president,how would the exercise of your unilateral powers relate to your ability to demonstrate power?Under what conditions might you choose to exercise your unilateral powers to achieve your policy goals? Provide specific examples
What will be an ideal response?