At her high school reunion, Emily realizes that several of her classmates have changed:
Mark, the class clown, confides that he takes medication to keep himself emotionally stable because he attempted suicide and tried to fly off the garage roof when he believed that he had invented a nuclear umbrella. Alice, the most likely to succeed, washes her hands repeatedly and dries them with tissues, her standard purification ritual, before she will drink the punch. The prom queen, Mary, is not at the reunion because she is afraid to leave her house. The star quarterback, Gary, says he is in charge of the CIA and that a group of terrorists plans to take him hostage. While he is talking, he carefully watches his wife dance with an old classmate and appears jealous. Choose two of Emily's classmates and make a diagnosis of the psychological disorder each may be suffering from, describe the disorder, and state what symptoms led to your diagnosis.
What will be an ideal response?
ANSWER:
Mark may have a bipolar disorder, which involves alternating between two emotional extremes. His attempt to fly off the roof and his belief that he had invented a nuclear umbrella are symptoms of mania. His suicide attempt is a symptom of severe depression. Alice may have an obsessive-compulsive disorder, a type of anxiety disorder in which a person becomes obsessed with certain thoughts or images or feels a compulsion to do certain things. Her hand-washing ritual, which she must perform before she can engage in other behaviors, is a symptom of this disorder. Mary may suffer from agoraphobia, a fear of being alone or away from the security of home. She will not leave her house, even to see old friends, and that inability to go out is a symptom of agoraphobia. Gary may suffer from paranoid schizophrenia. His symptoms include both delusions of persecution and delusions of grandeur, and he shows signs of jealousy.?
You might also like to view...
A Pearson correlation of r = –0.90 indicates that the data points are clustered close to a line that slopes down to the right
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
If your mouth waters each time you eat a cookie, you may learn to salivate when you merely see a cookie or a picture of cookie. Your mouth watering to the sight of a cookie illustrates
a. an automatic, non-learned response. b. learning by consequences. c. classical conditioning. d. operant conditioning.
Cognitive theorists have used the ____ approach to better understand how children develop more efficient problem-solving approaches
a. sequential design b. observation method c. microgenetic design d. case study method
Dr. Preemie is conducting a research study of the prevalence and correlates of drug use in college students. Because of the sensitive nature of the research topic, Dr. Preemie promises her participants confidentiality. Each college student who participates completes a set of surveys and an interview about his or her lifestyle and drug use habits. One participant, Carrie, reveals that she engages in moderate to heavy drug use (i.e., drinks two to four alcoholic beverages each day, and smokes marijuana several times per week). During the interview, Carrie mentions that she's feeling nauseous. Concerned, Dr. Preemie asks, "Do you want to stop the interview and go to the campus medical center?" "No," Carrie replies, "It's just morning sickness. I'm pregnant." "Oh," says Dr. Preemie, who nods,
and continues with the interview.Afterward, in her office, Dr. Preemie is torn and wonders to herself, "I'm worried about Carrie. Drugs and alcohol disrupt prenatal development, but I promised confidentiality. I can't tell anyone about this! Should I say something to Carrie? I'm supposed to be nonjudgmental! Intervening might keep other students from participating in my research, for fear that I'd break my promises. I don't know what to do."Consider Dr. Preemie's dueling obligations. As a researcher, is she is responsible to Carrie as a participant in her study? Is Dr. Preemie responsible to the developing fetus? Her institution? Do Dr. Preemie's actions have any ramifications for the other participants in her study? How might these responsibilities conflict? What will be an ideal response?