Summarize the permissible grounds for a frisk
What will be an ideal response?
Terry held that a frisk is permissible only when an officer reasonably fears for his or her safety. However, there is no easy way to define exactly what facts would cause an officer to reasonably fear for his or her safety. If an officer can offer no facts or testimony to support the frisk, it will probably be declared unconstitutional. On the other hand, if the officer possesses some objective information that served as the basis for a frisk (such as observing a bulge in a suspect's pocket), the frisk is probably legal.
You might also like to view...
A Performance-Based Management (PBM) system focuses strictly on measurements
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The American__________ Society publishes the Judicial ConductReporter, a quarterly periodical that tracks developments in judicialdiscipline and changes in judicial codes of conduct
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
In which U.S. Supreme Court did the Court decide that executions are unconstitutional for crimes committed by those younger than 18 years of age?
a. Roper v. Simmons (2005) b. Graham v. Florida (2010) c. Kent v. United States (1966) d. Schall v. Martin (1984)
The legal foundation for prosecuting money laundering as a federal crime is the Narcotic Penalties and Enforcement Act of 1986
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false