What problems do researchers confront when dealing with qualitative comparative research across contexts?

What will be an ideal response?


The limitations of examining data from a single location have encouraged many social scientists to turn to comparisons among many geographical entities. As noted in the 2001 American Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences’ Presidential Address by Richard Bennett (2004), comparative research in criminal justice and criminology took on a new importance after the terrorist attacks on September 11. Bennett described two types of comparative research:
1. Research that seeks to understand the structure, nature, or scope of a nation’s or nations’ criminal justice systems or rates of crime is descriptive comparative research.
2. Research that seeks to understand how national systems work and the factors related to their operations is analytic comparative research.
There is also variability in the scope of comparative research. Studies can examine crime patterns in single nations, make a comparison across several nations, or conduct transnational research, which generally explores how cultures and nations deal with crime that transcends their borders. Investigating terrorism is one emerging form of transnational research. Bennett (2004) notes,
One of the outcomes of the terrorist attacks in 2001 was a shocking awareness that terrorism is international and inextricably tied to transnational criminal activity.... We need to understand how criminal and terrorist organizations fund themselves and exploit our inability to link and analyze criminal activity that transcends national borders.
Although comparative methods are often associated with cross-national comparisons, research examining smaller aggregates such as states and cities can also be subsumed under the comparative research umbrella. Comparative research methods allow for a broader vision about social relations than is possible with cross-sectional research limited to one location.
Comparative research is research comparing data from more than one time period and/or more than one nation.
Descriptive comparative research is research that seeks to understand the structure, nature, or scope of a nation’s or nations’ criminal justice systems or rates of crime.
Analytic comparative research is research that seeks to understand how national systems work and the factors related to their operations.
Transnational research explores how cultures and nations deal with crime that transcends their borders.

Criminal Justice

You might also like to view...

According to a major study of white collar crime defense work, compared with conventional crime defense, much earlier involvement in the case is the norm

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Criminal Justice

At least some companies have refused to use e-seals because they think they are

A) too easily bypassed B) too expensive C) frequency problems D) A and B

Criminal Justice

Discuss the structure and effectiveness of residential community corrections (RCC) facilities.

What will be an ideal response?

Criminal Justice

There are several pertinent court cases that pertain to the right to counsel. Which court cases, in your opinion, are the most important to the prosecution, the defense, and to the overall system?  Defend your position.

What will be an ideal response?

Criminal Justice