The Supreme Court ruled that unannounced cell searches do not require warrants, do not violate inmates' Fourth Amendment rights, and are justified by the need to maintain order in:
a. Morrissey v. Brewer.
b. Bell v. Wolfish.
c. Gideon v. Wainwright.
d. Katz v. United States.
b
You might also like to view...
List the ways in which probation benefits communities as opposed to imprisonment.
What will be an ideal response?
Aubrey Jamison, a 17-year-old student, is arrested for possession of marijuana in her high school after an anonymous tip led the principal and guidance counselor to search her locker and the belongings therein. A small about of the narcotic and three prescription-strength oxycodone pills were found in her purse. Given this information, answer the following questions.?Aubrey's parents sued the
school district, stating that the search was unconstitutional and that without a valid warrant the search should not have been allowed. Based on Supreme Court rulings, ?the Jamisons would: A) lose based on New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985). B) lose based on Tennant v. Wilksbury School District (1999). C) ?win based on the fact the principal is not allowed to search a student's locker and possessions because of his or her position of power. D) ?win based on In re Winship (1970 ) which requires a valid warrant. E) ?win based on J.D.B. v. North Carolina (1970 ) which forbids police from taking a child from school without the parents consent.
This approach emphasizes the necessity of tailoring crime prevention responses to the specific characteristics of the crime problem being addressed—it rejects any one-size-fits-all thinking
What will be an ideal response?
What do defendants need to prove in order to use the defense of justification?
What will be an ideal response?