Which of the following is a benefit of creating a vulnerability chart?
a. It forces the investigators to explicitly consider all aspects of a fraud act.
b. It conveys a warning to all employees that fraud will not be tolerated.
c. It lists/coordinates the steps the investigator must take to uncover the perpetrator.
d. It shows management where controls are weak.
a
FEEDBACK: a. Correct.
b. Incorrect. Most employees are not aware that the chart is being created.
c. Incorrect. The vulnerability chart does not uncover the perpetrator.
d.
You might also like to view...
A(n) ________ is a fiduciary relationship which results from the manifestation of consent by one person to another that the other shall act in his behalf and subject to his control, and consent by the other so to act
A) assignment B) garnishment C) accommodation D) agency
The Milicic v. Basketball Marketing Company, Inc case illustrated the proper use of a preliminary injunction
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Organizations with an entrepreneurial orientation are more likely to be successful, particularly for
A. low-reward (low-profit) businesses. B. low-risk businesses. C. maintaining the status quo. D. conducting business internationally. E. conducting business domestically.
The Customer Meeting (Scenario)Kelly, a production supervisor, is responsible for 10 employees who assemble components into a finished product that is sold to distributors. Kelly reports to Ben, a production manager, who in turn reports to Dan, a general manager, who reports to McKenna, a vice president of operations. Recently, McKenna asked Dan to have a meeting with Kelly and Ben regarding some customer concerns in the production area. The focus of the meeting was to judge the validity of the customer concerns, and to develop a specific plan to address these concerns.Kelly, Ben, Dan, and McKenna are part of an organization that has a ________.
A. traditional committee structure B. traditional pyramid structure C. modern matrix structure D. modern jury structure