Darrell is a narcotics detective and while reading an electronics catalog comes across an ad for a device that promises that it can descramble any mobile phone signal. Darrell orders the device and on his off-duty hours uses it to listen in on a suspected drug dealer’s telephone conversations. Later, he seeks a warrant based on these conversations. Are Darrell’s actions constitutional?
a. Yes, because he used his own funds to buy the device.
b. Yes, because he only listened in on his off-duty hours.
c. No, because the device was regular police issue.
d. No, because he did not have a warrant to use the device.
d. No, because he did not have a warrant to use the device.
You might also like to view...
Why do statutes require invention promoters or developers to disclose their customers' success rates in receiving net financial profit as a result of the promoters' services?
What will be an ideal response?
Paralegal students study:
a. Procedural law b. Substantive law c. Specialties within substantive law d. All of these choices are correct
?The choice of law approach that considers whether the policy of State A or the policy of State B will be more greatly impaired by the selection of which state's law applies.
A. ?territorial approach B. ?center of gravity approach C. ?significant contacts approach D. ?consequences-based approach
Evidentiary hearings are not necessary when the central facts of the case are test results or other scientific information
a. True b. False