In Eastman Kodak v. Image Technical Services, Kodak was charged with tying the sale of service of their copiers and other equipment to the sale of parts. The Supreme Court ruled:
a. no tying arrangement existed because the markets for service and sale of parts overlapped b. no tying arrangement was proved to have existed, so there could be no antitrust illegality
c. a tying arrangement existed, but Kodak held a small share of the market for service and parts, so rule of reason analysis allowed the arrangement to stand
d. no tying arrangement existed because independent service organizations could purchase Kodak parts fromKodak whenever they so desired e. none of the other choices
e
You might also like to view...
Like self-disclosure, trust is what type of process?
A. unilateral B. triadic C. reciprocal D. retroactive
If a company’s production process is not aligned with the volume and variety demanded of the product, then the company ______.
A. has made a bad decision with regard to choice of process B. needs to stop production C. needs to find a new market for its product D. needs to offshore its production
________ is the use of advertising and publicity to get your marketing message out to your customers.
A. Communication B. Marketing C. Promotion D. Imagery
The succinct verbal communication style is characteristic for which of the following countries?
a. USA b. China c. Germany d. Denmark