In Oldani v. Oldani, 132 Conn. App. 609, 35 A.3d 407 (2011), plaintiff challenged the fairness of a prenuptial agreement that she had entered into with her husband. The court held that:
a. The agreement was valid because Mrs. Oldani's independent counsel had a chance to investigate her fiancé's financial holdings.
b. The agreement was valid because Mrs. Oldani had a law degree.
c. The agreement was invalid because Mr. Oldani had failed to reveal his income, despite Mrs. Oldani's being represented by counsel.
d. The agreement was invalid because Mr. Oldani co-opted Mrs. Oldani's attorney, and exerted undue influence.
c
You might also like to view...
There are various ways of regulating paralegals that have been discussed and attempted in many states. All of the different types of regulation methods are designed assume that:
A) paralegals must work under the supervision of lawyers. B) paralegals will be held to the highest ethical standards and are considered professionals. C) paralegals will be regulated by the highest court of the state. D) paralegals will have specific educational requirements.
A demand for inspection allows a party to gain access to the property in the possession of another party.
a. true b. false
How are alimony and child support payments established?
What will be an ideal response?
The case of Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association ruled that
a. lawyers’ television advertising may not be misleading b. lawyers may not use jingles in their advertisements c. lawyers may use direct-mail solicitation to attract clients d. lawyers may host legal talk shows e. none of the above