How did the court in Warshak v. United States handle the issue of whether a person, whose business was under criminal investigation, had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of his personal e-mail account?
a. The court held that Warshak assumed the risk that the recipient of his e-mails would reveal the contents of e-mails.
b. The court found that screening e-mails for viruses or pornography does not invade an individual’s content-based privacy in the e-mails and has little bearing on his expectation of privacy in the content.
c. The court found that protecting shared communications through e-mails is as important to the Fourth Amendment principles today as protecting telephone conversations has been in the past.
d. All of the above reflect the court’s opinion in Warshak.
d. All of the above reflect the court’s opinion in Warshak.
You might also like to view...
The Federal Probation System was ________
a. mandated by the U.S. Supreme Court in Ex Parte United States in 1916 b. adopted in 1909 from correctional practices developed by the U.S. Military Judicial System c. established by the executive order of President Eisenhower in 1954 d. authorized by the National Probation Act of 1925
The police and the media need each other
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following is not an area of problem behavior for police?
a. Acceptance of gratuities b. Refusal to implement new policies c. Improper use of force d. Deception
What is meant by the term “shared environment” and why is it important in genetic research on crime?
What will be an ideal response?