Briefly discuss the underlying moral dilemma contained in the practice of deceptive interrogation, providing at least one example
What will be an ideal response?
Should define/describe deceptive interrogation as the use of psychological persuasion or manipulation to elicit information (including confessions) from suspects during interrogations. The moral dilemma is whether it is ever (and, if so, under what circumstances) justifiable to use morally questionably means to secure "good" ends in police work. Examples could include any from the list on page 161, including: misrepresenting the seriousness of the offense, role-playing, using promises, and fabricated evidence.
You might also like to view...
Which court case held that the imposition of the death penalty for cases of child rape was unconstitutional?
a. Kennedy v. Louisiana b. Furman v. Georgia c. United States v. Quinones d. Kansas v. Hendricks
Protection against double jeopardy does apply when an officer is prosecuted under state and federal criminal laws for the same act
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
An ethical belief of officers includes believing that they should conduct themselves with pride and professionalism both on and off duty
a. True b. False
Debate the double-edged sword experienced by women who suffer from IPV at the hands of their military spouses
What will be an ideal response?