The Canadian Asbestos case is an illustration of:
a. restrictions based on a threat to the environment created by a product itself.
b. restrictions based on a threat to the environment created by a production process.
c. pollution litigation in the affected country.
d. pollution litigation in the polluting country.
a
You might also like to view...
_____ is the conflict-handling style in which a person neglects his or her own concerns and allows the concerns of another to prevail.
A. Forcing B. Avoiding C. Accommodating D. Collaborating E. Compromising
According to early LMX theory, which of the following is false?
A. the out-group has less influence with the leader than does the in-group B. the leader usually expects extra duties from out-group members C. in-group members are chosen on the basis of compatibility with the leader D. out-group members may not want to be in-group members
Sue, a resident of the state of New York, is visiting her aunt in Iowa. On her way, her car is hit by Jerry, a resident of the state of Iowa who is drunk. Sue is injured in the accident. Which of the following actions is Sue allowed to take?
A) Sue can sue Jerry and bring the case to Iowa state court provided that the dollar amount of the controversy exceeds $75,000. B) Sue can file a case against Jerry in the New York state court as she is a resident of that state. C) Sue can file a case against Jerry only in the Iowa state court as this is a matter that involves state negligence law. D) Sue can sue Jerry and bring the case to Iowa federal court as this is a case that involves diversity of citizenship.
What is the downfall of the devil’s advocate?
a. solutions from a team with a devil’s advocate rarely come to a conclusion b. solutions from a team with a devil’s advocate never produce superior outcomes c. people tend to eliminate the devil’s advocate because he or she makes them feel uncomfortable d. the devil’s advocate encourages people to take sides in team discussions