Courts that have allowed the state-created danger exception apply it in one of two ways. The first way requires (a) a special relationship between the government and the victim, plus (b):
a. a plaintiff who committed only a minor offense
b. an affirmative defense
c. a danger created by the state
d. a danger created by the plaintiff
c
You might also like to view...
WOF states the purpose of juvenile medication programs best?
What will be an ideal response?
The tenets of institutional anomie theory, teach that which of the following would be a useful policy goal?
A. address negative emotions through coping strategies B. increase collective efficacy at the neighborhood level C. increase legitimate economic opportunities in society D. reduce the role of economic factors in other social institutions such as the family
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. There is evidence that blacks are more likely to be serial murderers than other groups. 2. Countries with greater inequalities in income distribution have lower murder rates. 3. Alcohol is a contributing factor in the majority of homicides, assaults, and rapes. 4. Mental illness or brain damage characterizes pathologically violent offenders. 5. Workplace violence is the number two factor in on-the-job deaths and number one among women.
To exclude identification evidence on due process grounds, defendants have to prove (by a preponderance of the evidence) that the totality of the circumstances shows the identification procedure to have been unnecessarily suggestive and that this unnecessarily suggestive procedure created:
a. some slight likelihood of misidentification. b. a very substantial likelihood of misidentification. c. an almost guaranteed likelihood of misidentification. d. harm to the defendant.