In the case of Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that...
a. an IEP is legal if it is calculated to provide an education that results in some benefit to the student.
b. an IEP is not a legal document so schools cannot be sued for not following the provisions contained in the IEP.
c. an IEP is legal if it is reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances.
d. an IEP is legal if it is calculated to enable the child to reach his or her potential.
Answer: c. an IEP is legal if it is reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances.
You might also like to view...
Why should an organization provide training for the Mentor Coaches and Protégés?
a.No training is neededb.Ongoing training with support and technical assistance is essential for a successful Mentor Coach programc.Training is needed only in the beginning
Vocabulary can be taught explicitly, through the use of context clues, or
A) expressively. B) incidentally. C) singularly. D) progressively.
What are three types of financial aid?
What will be an ideal response?
What is the difference between an aptitude and an ability?
What will be an ideal response?