Explain the IRAC method of case analysis
What will be an ideal response?
In the study of law, legal cases are usually examined using the IRAC method (an acronym that stands for issue, rule, application, and conclusion) as outlined in the following:
I = What is the legal issue in the case?
R = What is the rule (law) of the case?
A = What is the court's analysis and rationale?
C = What was the conclusion or outcome of the case?
First, the facts of the case are investigated and understood. Next, the legal issue that is to be answered is identified and succinctly stated. Then the law that is to be applied to the case is identified, read, and understood. Once the facts, law, and legal issue have been stated, critical thinking is used in applying the law to the facts of the case. This requires that the decision maker
—whether a judge, juror, or student—analyze, examine, evaluate, interpret, and apply the law to the facts of the case. Last, the critical legal thinker must reach a conclusion and state his or her judgment.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following key decisions is involved in composing?
A) What must be the purpose of the message? B) Which mode of communication must be used? C) How can the content be revised effectively? D) How can the format be designed for best effect? E) How can the audience and their needs be analyzed?
_________: Any field in this area will appear above the pivot table and will be used to filter the report.
a) Report Filter b) Column Labels c) Row Labels d) Values e) None of the above
Imagine that you are talking to the owner of a motel chain about buying furniture from your company. His secretary comes in and asks him to sign some papers immediately. He takes about ten minutes to read over the papers before he signs them. What should you as the professional salesperson do?
What will be an ideal response?
Joel's car broke down on a dark, rainy night. Along came Andy in his four-wheel drive truck with tools and supplies in the back. Joel didn't have any credit cards and had only $3.25 cash, so Andy told him to write a check or an IOU. Neither Andy nor Joel had any paper, so Joel wrote on the cover of Andy's lunchbox: "If my car is fixed right by Andy Walcott, I will pay him $150. (Signed) Joel
Boyd." Andy indorses the note and takes it to a bank for negotiation. The bank refuses, saying it is non-negotiable because: A) it is written on a lunchbox. B) it mentions the existence of a contract to repair the car. C) it is conditional on satisfactory repair of the car. D) Andy does not have a photo ID.