Explain the “balancing test” established by the Supreme Court in deciding issues of prisoners’ rights. How might such a test apply to the emerging area of inmate privacy?
What will be an ideal response?
Applied to the corrections arena in the 1974 ruling in Pell v. Procunier, the balancing test is a principle developed by the courts that seeks to weigh a prisoner’s constitutionally guaranteed rights against the state’s authority to make laws or otherwise restrict a person’s freedom in order to protect its interests and its citizens. As a gauge for determining regulatory limits on inmates’ privacy, the balancing test can be used to identify limitations that unduly restrict inmates’ privacy rights without an articulable and significant adverse impact on the state’s protective interests. In the absence of such a balance, the limitation can be seen as a violation of prisoners’ protected liberties.
You might also like to view...
__________ camps began in 1983 in Georgia and Oklahoma, before being adopted in other states
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Because the burden of proof remains on the state, the defense attorney is required to present its case first
a. True b. False
When both parties in domestic violence—related assault are arrested, it is called a:
A. Proarrest. B. Dual arrest. C. Arrest by gender. D. Mandatory arrest.
What are boot camps and how does the procedures used in boot camps result in increased recidivism?
What will be an ideal response?