An achievement test for advanced math was developed for high school students. In the process of preparing the test, a number of steps were carried out. Choose the option that most directly relates to each of the following steps. For 5,000 cases, two forms of the test were given and scores on Form A were correlated with scores on Form B. This step is concerned with
a. reliability.
b. validity evidence based on content.
c. validity evidence based on relationship to the other variables.
d. validity evidence based on response processes.
A
You might also like to view...
Use of the word aminal displays a. faulty hearing
b. poor enunciation. c. omitting sounds. d. substituting sounds.
Student Teams – Achievement Division (STAD) is used when the
A) students need to find solutions to group problems B) students discuss worksheets, quizzing one another on content C) teachers want to cover a large quantity of content in a short time D) students are given diagnostic test or exercise by a student monitor to determine placement in materials
School system one has a system in place in which students are screened and then provided with increasingly individualized interventions that depend on the need of the student. They use progress monitoring data to make instructional decisions for students. A child qualifies for special education when they have shown little progress with the increasing intensity of interventions. School system two
has a system in place in which a student is referred to the psychologist and is administered an IQ and achievement test and the results of the two tests are then compared. What specific learning disability eligibility system is each school using? What will be an ideal response?
A researcher makes a judgment of how well the finished product of Toyota’s new Hybrid car performs, and based on that judgment, consumers will have the information needed to know if they want to purchase this car. What type of evaluation would this be?
a. Formative evaluation b. Summative evaluation c. Needs evaluation d. Efficiency evaluation