Examine the ideal role of American judges
A) Judges should intervene frequently, interpreting the law according to their expertise and ensuring a fair trial. B) Judges should act as umpires, passively watching the legal drama and ruling only on disputed points of procedure.
C) Judges should not intervene unless attorneys object, at which point they may either overrule or sustain the objection. D) Judges should take an active role, questioning witnesses, eliciting evidence, and commenting on procedure.
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
Proposition 22--gay marriages pitted those supporting individual rights with those supporting _____
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Omnibus legislation
a. allows Congress to exercise a veto over the Supreme Court. b. allows Congress to both propose and ratify constitutional amendments. c. allows Congress to hide controversial legislation among bills that have a greater chance of being passed. d. allows Congress to override a presidential veto with a 51 percent majority. e. allows Congress to veto constitutional amendments.
The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) policy differs from the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) policy in that ________
A. TANF imposes new restrictions on families receiving cash assistance B. TANF does not expand the goals of welfare policy C. states under TANF are given lesser flexibility in administering welfare policies D. states under TANF have to spend most of their welfare dollars on monthly cash payments to families E. states under TANF have to use only public bureaucracies to administer welfare
Explain the various ways a public organization is different from a private organization.
What will be an ideal response?