Why is an arbitrator's decision likely to be a compromise?
What will be an ideal response?
An arbitrator's decision is more likely to be a compromise than a decision handed down by a court for a number of reasons. First, the arbitrator is not as constrained by precedent as are judges. An arbitrator is interested in resolving a factual dispute, not in establishing or strictly applying a rule of law. Second, the arbitrator may be more interested than a judge in preserving an ongoing relationship with the parties. A compromise is much more likely to achieve this result than is a clear win-or-lose decision. Finally, because an arbitrator frequently decides cases in a particular area, he or she wants to maintain a reputation of being fair to both sides. For example, a person who focuses on labor arbitrations would not want to gain a reputation as being pro-labor or pro-management.
You might also like to view...
A manufacturing company just hired a new risk manager, and she has instituted several employee safety programs
She has persuaded the insurer writing the company's workers compensation insurance to base the premium on the company's actual loss experience during the current coverage period rather than on the company's historical performance. This type of plan is called a(n) A) retrospectively rated plan. B) class rated plan. C) experience rated plan. D) judgment rated plan.
Compared with other promotion methods, personal selling
A. is less flexible in adapting to customers' needs and attitudes. B. is less expensive when the target customers are numerous and widespread. C. is less effective in overcoming sales resistance. D. provides more immediate feedback. E. All these answers are correct.
An FOIA request can be denied if national security information is involved
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
An underlying factor that may prevent managers from delegating is the personality traits of their followers.
a. true b. false