Some advocate that judges, even those on the United States Supreme Court, should be strict constructionists, having a rigid reading and interpretation of the law. Take an opposing view, and justify your answer
What will be an ideal response?
The opposing view of strict constructionism is interpreting laws more broadly, often referring to the "spirit of the law" rather than to the specific wording of the law. Some argue that this position allows for the Supreme Court to modernize the law and ensure a consistent legal perspective across the United States.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is most important in controlling delinquency?
a. Relationships with fathers b. Relationships with mothers c. Relationships with mothers and fathers are of equal importance
Two lower-class subcultural focal concerns are cooperation and trust
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
If parole is a privilege, then its _____________ process is not subject to due process or rules of evidence
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Explain Wright's contention that goal conflict is desirable
What will be an ideal response?