INSTRUCTIONS: In each problem below you are given a statement, its truth value in parentheses, and an operation/relation to be performed on that statement. You must identify the new statement and the truth value of the new statement. Take the Aristotelian standpoint and assume that ‘A' and ‘B' denote things that actually exist. Some A are non-B. (F) Obversion
A) Some A are not B. (F)
B) Some A are not non-B. (T)
C) Some A are B. (F)
D) No A are B. (F)
E) Some B are non-A. (Und.)
A
You might also like to view...
According to St. Thomas, a series of efficient causes cannot stretch to infinity because
A) if there is no first among efficient causes, neither will there be a last or an intermediate. B) there exists a regular order of efficient causes. C) something must exist contingently. D) God revealed this truth in the scriptures.
Locke wondered about the effects of linguistic confusions on philosophy
indicate whether this statement is true or false
If the claims of an expert turn out to be in error, were you unreasonable in having accepted them in the first place? Why, or why not? Explain your response in a brief essay.
What will be an ideal response?
The _____________ would say "Show me!" if she was being asked to believe that something exists
a. empiricist b. rationalist c. analytic philosopher d. postmodernist