In the Clark v. Arizona (2006) case, the U.S. Supreme Court held:
a. states such as Arizona had the right to limit the insanity defense and the evidence used to support it
b. states and the federal government could not legislate a defense such as insanity
c. insanity defense could not be used in murder cases with law enforcement victims
d. the defendant gets to choose whether to raise the insanity defense and its evidence
A
You might also like to view...
Which of the following intends to control the problem of multiple-treatment inference?
a. interrupted time-series design b. two-group ex post facto design c. posttest-only control group design d. counterbalanced design
Drug dealers who sell the majority of drugs in parks, schools, or other public places are called ______
a. petty dealers b. persistent dealers c. losers d. frequent dealers
What is the basic mechanism of probation and parole supervision?
a. Adequate funding b. Client contact c. Adequate personnel d. None of the above
The National Academy of Science's report has shown
a. the death penalty has a strong deterrence effect on crime b. the death penalty has moral and constitutional properties c. there is no conclusive evidence on the deterrent effect of the death penalty d. the death penalty affects the murder rate