Define the concept of cherry-picking. Explain its relevance to the systematic review of evidence, compared to the traditional literature review.
What will be an ideal response?
Ans: The systematic review of evidence avoids cherry-picking by having a protocol for the literature search that is developed before the search begins. The traditional literature review is more vulnerable to cherry-picking by the reviewer because it does not necessarily have this feature.
Learning Objective: 4-3: Identify levels of evidence with emphasis on the systematic review as the highest level.
Cognitive Domain: Comprehension
Answer Location: Levels of Evidence
Difficulty Level: Medium
You might also like to view...
In single?system research, a treatment that leads clients to fully achieve the goals that have
been set for them is called:
a. therapeutically effective. b. experimentally effective. c. statistically effective. d. substantively effective.
The impact of welfare reform of the 90's ____________in the
wellbeing of children. A. is showing a decline B. is still unknown C. has shown an improvement D. has not yet been studied
Which statement is correct about the use of evaluations by one's peers among staff members?
A. They should always be performed anonymously. B. They can be useful for determining pay raises or deciding who should be promoted. C. They can be useful if they are used only for constructive feedback. D. They are never appropriate; evaluation of staff members is the job of one's supervisor.
In social work, the term administration is often used synonymously with management.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)